Ahhhh very good information thanks.
I think what is happening is this: on WinningPoker, using a normal WheelUp/WheelDown will cause the bet size to change by 1bb. This happens even with SaT turned off. Try using the wheel without SaT. That is just a feature from WinningPoker.
So when we use the ~, we are telling SaT: 1. do the SaT hotkey action and then 2. pass the key/click event to the system. So 1. SaT changes the betsize by 0.5bb, but then 2. WinningPoker receives the WheelUp event also, and increases the bet size by 1bb
It works when you don't use the ~ because without the ~, SaT blocks the hotkey from passing through to the system, and WinningPoker never sees it.
Unfortunately I don't know any way around this in your specific case (of using 2 instances of SaT), other than just using a different key, such as P in your example. What you could try is, using a keyboard remapping program, and change WheelUp to instead send the letter P, and then keep the ~P hotkey in SaT.
I think what is happening is this: on WinningPoker, using a normal WheelUp/WheelDown will cause the bet size to change by 1bb. This happens even with SaT turned off. Try using the wheel without SaT. That is just a feature from WinningPoker.
So when we use the ~, we are telling SaT: 1. do the SaT hotkey action and then 2. pass the key/click event to the system. So 1. SaT changes the betsize by 0.5bb, but then 2. WinningPoker receives the WheelUp event also, and increases the bet size by 1bb
It works when you don't use the ~ because without the ~, SaT blocks the hotkey from passing through to the system, and WinningPoker never sees it.
Unfortunately I don't know any way around this in your specific case (of using 2 instances of SaT), other than just using a different key, such as P in your example. What you could try is, using a keyboard remapping program, and change WheelUp to instead send the letter P, and then keep the ~P hotkey in SaT.
