Going back to stack
#3
First, I'm glad that you have taken the time to test the program and tweak it to your liking. You seem to have a good grasp of how it works.

For the mouse click on 'fold' button problem, the only idea I have is that there are so many tables and clicks that the program is getting backed up. When "Left Click Detection" (advanced options) is enabled to detect mouse clicks, SaT must check every time you click the mouse. You'd be surprised how many random clicks you make just clicking between windows, and it can sometimes get backed up. But 1 out of 20 is not very good.

Another reason could be the table size. Just as you saw when you were making your own configs for unsupported sites, SaT simply grabs a rectangle of the fold button and looks for clicks on the table within that region. This is based off of the default table size. If your grid slot size is very large or small, that fold rectangle is scaled proportionally, but on some sites (ongame for example) their buttons arent in the same proportionate location. I've added hacks to try to accomodate for this, but sometimes its still off.

What you can try, (if you are not satisfied with using the fold+stack hotkey and want to use mouse instead), is creating custom configs for each site instead of using the built in settings. And of course make sure to use the table size that you plan on using when going through the wizard.

Re: the fold+stack hotkey, another user just recently reported the same problem using RButton on OnGame, maybe their software is just not liking the right mouse click. Try using a different key and see if that matters.

As for Bodog, I've never gotten to trying that site, but you are exactly correct that if the table background is the same color as the fold button, then SaT will mistakenly detect the tables as needing action. If you can mod the bodog graphics you could get around this. As for CakePoker, don't even get me started. Their software is the nut worst in regards to poker clients. Nothing I've tried works for version2 of their software. I've given up
Reply


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Username::
Image Verification
Please enter the text contained within the image into the text box below it. This process is used to prevent automated spam bots.
Image Verification
(case insensitive)
Please select the number: 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Messages In This Thread
Going back to stack - by Guest - 03-06-2012, 04:35 AM
RE: Going back to stack - by Guest - 03-06-2012, 06:52 AM
RE: Going back to stack - by SaT_Admin - 03-06-2012, 03:20 PM
RE: Going back to stack - by Guest - 03-09-2012, 01:48 PM
RE: Going back to stack - by SaT_Admin - 03-10-2012, 03:56 AM
RE: Going back to stack - by Guest - 03-10-2012, 01:18 PM